Risky Business

November 2009

Risky Business Main Page

MVRMA Home Page MVRMA Overview Membership Insurance Program Service Providers Members Only

FYI:

-Mike Hammond 

More than Insurance

MVRMA members understand their participation in the association means they are "owners" and benefit by sharing in the pool's financial success. Member participation is much more than just purchasing insurance. This point was again illustrated at the September 28, 2009 Quarterly Board Meeting, when Loss Year 15 (2003) was declared "closed." Per the Surplus Loss Reserves Disbursement Policy, the Board then directed the remaining funds of $1,611,448 be distributed to the members who participated in that loss year.

To date, MVRMA has been able to close 14 of its 21 loss years and has refunded $5,778,890 to its members. That amount represents a return of 49.7% of the loss funding contributed during those loss years.

Each year, as part of the MVRMA annual budget, a loss funding amount is established specifically to pay claims within our self-insured layer. This amount is determined by studies conducted by our independent actuary. It is based on our loss cost experience and exposures for the coming year. The selected funding amount provides for a confidence level of 60-70%. For example, the loss funding amount contributed for LY 15 was $1,762,231 and provided a confidence level of 65%. This amount represented a little more than half of the overall member contributions for 2003.

Since members and pool contribution factors (PCF) may vary from year to year, all loss funds are segregated by loss year. Claims are paid according to occurrence date from the funds contributed for that loss year. Likewise, quarterly deductibles and all other claim receipts are credited to the appropriate loss fund by occurrence date. Interest earnings are credited monthly according to each loss fund's share of MVRMA's total portfolio. Following these procedures maintains the integrity of each loss fund.

For example, LY 15 earned $326,685 in interest income, while net claim payments, after quarterly deductibles and other receipts, totaled $477,468. The refund of $1,611,448 represents a return of 91.44% of the monies originally contributed to the LY 15 loss fund!

The action to close a loss year is only taken after all known claims and lawsuits for that particular year have been settled and/or paid. Additionally, the loss year must have been in existence at least four years to insure the statute of limitations has expired. The normal life span of a loss year is 5-9 years.

Unlike a commercial insurance company or other insurance pooling arrangement, MVRMA refunds surplus loss reserves to contributing members when a loss year is declared closed. These refunds are distributed in the same proportion as originally contributed. Per the Surplus Loss Reserves Disbursement Policy, MVRMA deposits each member's share in the member's General Reserve Fund (GRF) account. The member then has 30 days to notify MVRMA of its decision to leave the funds on deposit in the GRF or to:

1) Apply all or a portion of its surplus to any outstanding MVRMA invoice or 2) Receive all or portion of its surplus in the form of a refund.

Members are encouraged to maintain a significant balance in the GRF. Being able to access those funds to supplement an unexpected spike in the annual contribution provides for stable funding from year to year.

The potential for surplus loss reserves in any given loss year should provide a real incentive for our members to practice good loss control measures and transfer risk whenever possible. By focusing on safety training, effective management and policy development, we can all benefit from reduced loss expense. Making risk management a priority is essential to the success of the MVRMA program.

During this difficult economic period, we are pleased that that our members are able to benefit from the closure of a loss year and the return of the surplus funds. This is one of the many benefits of being an "owner" in MVRMA.

back to top



Counselors' Comments

 - Surdyk, Dowd & Turner

Ohio Supreme Court Upheld as Constitutional ORC 2744.05(C)(1)

On October 1, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court in Oliver v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. Ltd. Partnership upheld as constitutional Ohio Revised Code Section 2744.05(C)(1), which places a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages awards against cities and other political subdivisions of the state. Non-economic damages include pain, suffering, loss of companionship and/or loss of consortium; they do not include economic damages, such as lost wages, medical bills and damages to property.

In Oliver, the plaintiffs were arrested in connection with the detonation of an explosive device during a baseball game. The plaintiffs were jailed for four days and claimed to have been subjected to poor treatment by corrections officers. Although charged with aggravated arson and felonious assault, the claims were later dismissed by the prosecutor's office. The plaintiffs then brought suit against the City of Cleveland for malicious prosecution, false arrest and imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The plaintiffs' case proceeded to a jury trial. The jury awarded each plaintiff $400,000 in compensatory damages. Pursuant to R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1), the City moved the court to reduce the damages award to $250,000 (per plaintiff). The trial court denied the City's motion.

The City appealed the trial court's decision to the Eighth District Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the $400,000 award on the basis that R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1) is unconstitutional as it violates a plaintiff's right to a jury trial and the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. The City appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.

The Ohio Supreme Court determined the right to a jury trial ensures that a jury's fact finding function is not invaded, but this right does not extend to questions of law. Thus, the Court reasoned that while a jury may determine the amount of damages as a matter of fact, the actual award may be reduced by the Court, as a matter of law, via application of a statute. The court thus concluded that a trial court does not intrude upon a jury's fact finding when it applies R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1) to reduce a jury award of non-economic damages in excess of $250,000.

In addition, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the equal protection clause did not render R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1) unconstitutional. The Court determined that because the issue did not involve a fundamental right nor did plaintiff belong to a protected class, the R.C. section 2744.05(C)(1) would be upheld if rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. The Court held that the state has a valid interest in preserving the financial soundness of its political subdivisions and that a limitation on non-economic damages is rationally related to this objective. Therefore, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the $250,000 cap on non-economic damages proscribed by R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1) did not run afoul of the equal protection clause.

The Supreme Court's decision in Oliver resolves any doubt regarding the validity and constitutionality of the R.C. Section 2744.05(C)(1) non-economic damages cap placed on claims against political subdivisions.

back to top



The Claims File

- Craig Blair

Employment Practices Liability (EPL) Coverage

MVRMA provides EPL coverage for its members. This coverage refers to claims that can be presented by former or current employees, or even individuals who, although not hired, completed applications for jobs with the city. These actions include claims of discrimination (race, gender, etc), harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation/whistle-blowing and disability-related issues to name a few. While our members do not generate a lot of these claims, they are usually the most difficult to work through for the city and MVRMA.

When an employee is terminated, emotions run high for everyone involved. Coworkers of the terminated individual may not always agree with management's decision. This can lead to disruption of the workplace and morale problems. That's why it's essential for management to thoroughly investigate and review each termination and to adhere to city policy.

When EPL lawsuits are filed against our members, demands will range from lost benefits (back and front pay) to damages for emotional/mental distress, defamation and pain and suffering. (MVRMA does not cover lost benefits.)

A recent issue of Public Risk reported that plaintiffs prevail 61% of the time in EPL actions. (Remember, most jurors are "employees," so they may feel sympathy for the plaintiff and see him as a "victim.") Fortunately, MVRMA's success rate is higher than the average, with only 45% of its cases settled in the plaintiff's favor.

As with any review of claims, we must consider the cost to our members. During the past 15 years, EPL claims have accounted for 20% of our total litigation files, but they comprise 33% of the monies spent for litigation. The average cost of an EPL claim is $39,400 while all other claims average $17,800. Defense of these claims generally costs three times more than other claims.

Due to the sensitive nature of EPL claims, MVRMA works closely with defense counsel to carefully monitor and review any EPL action. To properly protect the member and MVRMA, staff must consider the city's position, the allegations and facts that will go to a jury and of course, we can't ignore the insurance industry's history with EPL claims. All these factors are taken into account before deciding to mediate, settle or defend an EPL action.

back to top


Loss Control Lowdown

-Starr Markworth

Snowplow Rodeo

On Thursday, October 1, the Public Works Officials of Southwest Ohio put on their 23rd annual snowplow rodeo. The Snowplow Rodeo Committee meets regularly throughout the year to gain the support of vendor sponsors and to plan the all-day event. The committee is made up of city, county, township and village officials from various communities and included several officials from MVRMA cities.

This event brings together some of the best snowplow drivers in southwest Ohio. More than 60 drivers competed in the road course designed by MVRMA's own Conrad Flowers from the City of Mason Public Works Department.

The following seven MVRMA cities participated in the event: Blue Ash, Centerville, Indian Hill, Mason, Miamisburg, Springdale and Vandalia. Congratulations to the MVRMA drivers placing in the top 30: Marty Tackett, Centerville - 12th place; Keith Cooper, Blue Ash - 19th place; Chris Harold, Vandalia - 22nd place; David Smith, Indian Hill - 25th place; Brandon Slater, Springdale - 26th place and Jim Noel, Blue Ash - 28th place.

The Snowplow Rodeo provides an excellent opportunity to prepare for the upcoming snow and ice season. Many participating departments conduct their own similar events to determine which employees earn the privilege of representing their cities at the SW Ohio Snowplow Rodeo.

This event takes place annually on the first Thursday in October. If your city has not participated in the past, mark it on your calendars for next year - it is a great time and a great training opportunity!

back to top


Brokers Beat

As MVRMA prepares the 2010 budget, this is probably a good time to address the conditions of the commercial insurance marketplace. These conditions influence the pricing of the reinsurance and excess insurance that MVRMA purchases collectively on behalf of its members and will ultimately impact the bottom line of the budget.

In 2008, the commercial insurance marketplace experienced deteriorating financial results and underwriting performance, with the underwriting performance being dominated by Hurricane Ike losses. In 2009, these trends have reversed and stabilized to some degree. Investment losses actually improved in the first half of 2009, and underwriting performance also improved but remains at marginal levels.

Industry capital and surplus increased slightly to $463 billion in the first half of 2009. While this indicator dipped in 2008 due to investment losses and poor underwriting ratios, we suspect it will stabilize over the next 12 months. Because of continuing difficult economic conditions, credit is still scarce and recapitalization in the event of a catastrophic event would be very difficult. We are seeing scarce credit having a negative impact on many underwriting decisions.

Industry underwriting results for the first half of 2009 reveal an industry combined underwriting ratio of 100.9%, down from $105% in 2008. We predict a flat trend for underwriting performance for the balance of 2009 with the caveat that a significant catastrophic event would have a considerable influence on this ratio. Using Alliant's results from our 7/1/09 renewals, we would describe the current marketplace as flat for liability. While we experienced a slight hardening of the property marketplace in the spring of 2009, conversations with property underwriters since July 1st have indicated a flattening trend in this market segment.

In summary, we see a marketplace that is being driven by marginal underwriting performance and the realization that additional deterioration of capital and surplus generated by catastrophic events could be very difficult to replace. We see these factors influencing industry underwriting operations with underwriters still attempting to write new business while being cautious in the selection of risks. We see this cautious underwriting being characterized more by restrictive terms as opposed to increased pricing or rates. In absence of a major catastrophic event, we see liability and property markets in a flat trend for the balance of 2009 and into 2010. As we get closer to the end of the hurricane season on November 30, and the outlook for 2010 renewals becomes clearer, we will be updating specific forecasts for MVRMA renewals.

back to top


PRIMA Cybrary

Because of its PRIMA membership, MVRMA is able to research various risk management-related topics for its members through the PRIMA Cybrary. Just contact Starr Markworth at the MVRMA office, and she will forward whatever information is available on the PRIMA website. Topics include Safety and Loss Control, Risk Management Practices, Public Safety, Legislation and Compliance, Parks & Recreation, Job Descriptions, Sample RFPs and much more. See Page 6:05:01 of the MVRMA Handbook for a more complete listing.

For help with a risk management-related question or assistance with developing a policy or procedure, the PRIMA Cybrary may be the best resource. Let our membership dollars work for you.


back to top


SPEC Awards

The Safety Performance Evaluation Checklist Program was developed as a tool to be used by member cities, as well as MVRMA staff, to determine what safety and loss control areas require improvement. Annually, the MVRMA Loss Control Manager meets with each city's safety coordinator to determine compliance with the "best practices" of loss control and risk management detailed in the SPEC document. Awards are given each year as part of this compliance audit.

For 2009, we would like to congratulate the Pinnacle Award winners: the cities of Centerville, Indian Hill, Kettering and Troy for achieving 100% compliance. The city of Madeira received the Ascension Award for most improved compliance.

back to top


From the Board Room...   

At the September 28, 2009 Quarterly Board Meeting, the following actions were taken:

- Approved appealing the McCaughey v. Blue Ash verdict

- Approved the Open Claims & Incurred Losses Report

- Approved an agreement with Alliant Insurance Services for a review of the SPEC document

- Accepted MVRMA's Financial Report and CAFR for the Year Ending 12/31/08

- Accepted the actuary's Loss Funding Study for LY22 (2010)

- Approved a one-year agreement with Carol Riggle for preparation of financial statements for the year ending 12/31/09

- Approved a three-year agreement with Godbold Malpere & Co. for actuarial services

- Approved the 2010 Preliminary Expenditure Budget and PCF

- Approved MOC Endorsement 11-09, which provides liability coverage for EMS Medical Directors with regard to their administrative duties or acts while acting on behalf of the member by whom they were contracted

- Approved deletion of the Voluntary UM/UIM Coverage Policy effective 1/1/2010

- Approved closure of LY 15 (2003) which will return $1,611,448 to the members who participated in that loss year

back to top

 

 
 
Risky Business Main Page

MVRMA Home Page MVRMA Overview Membership Insurance Program Service Providers Members Only Training and Loss Control