|
- Michael Hammond
From time to time, insurance agents and brokers will
solicit our members with the lure of lower costs. When federal and state
cutbacks have created a burden on many local governments, resulting in
reduced services and staff, these offers are indeed tempting. However,
when reviewed and compared with the services and coverages offered by
MVRMA membership, the scales are definitely tipped in our favor!
When MVRMA was formed in December, 1988, the 6
original charter members took the steps necessary to ensure MVRMA members,
rather than an insurance company, would receive the benefits of pooling
their risk. You might ask, "How does this work, and what are the benefits
to my city?"
The first ingredient of a successful risk pool is
its members. In 15 years of operation, MVRMA has slowly and carefully
expanded its membership to the current 17 members. Unlike other insurance
agents and brokers, we do not randomly solicit municipalities for their
business. With the approval of our membership, we approach only those
municipalities that demonstrate a commitment to the concepts of risk
management/loss control and have exposure and loss experience consistent
with MVRMA members. This premise is very important since all members are
sharing and paying for losses within the pool's self insured retention.
The experience of the group not only determines the level of loss funding
in subsequent years but, more importantly, how much money remains when all
claims have been satisfied. Thus, MVRMA members are participating with a
very select group of municipalities.
Not all governmental risk pools and municipal
insurance programs are as selective as MVRMA. Additionally, not all
insurance and risk financing programs are created equal. However, MVRMA’s
experience and reputation for delivering high quality services at a very
reasonable cost speaks for itself.
Through risk pooling, MVRMA offers the following
benefits to meet your city's risk financing needs:
· Reduced costs due to a large self-insured
retention and tax exempt status
· Extensive internal control over claims
settlement and all litigation matters
· Greatly enhanced, occurrence based insurance
coverage
· Significantly reduced administrative overhead
costs
· Reduced cost due to group purchase of excess
insurance and minimization of broker/agent commissions
· Enhanced control over service providers
· Retention of investment income from surplus
reserves
Since MVRMA is member owned and member controlled
and is organized as a not-for-profit association, surplus funds, including
investment income, are returned to the members in the same proportion that
it was originally contributed. This is done in two ways:
1) At the end of each fiscal year, the unused
operating funds, less any reserves, are returned to the members as a
credit against their next year’s contribution.
2) When a loss year is closed, the remaining loss fund reserves are
distributed to the members of that loss year. To date, MVRMA has closed 10
of its 15 loss years and has returned 45% of the funds originally
contributed by the members to pay losses. Refunds total $2,921,881. Thus,
MVRMA members retain the pool's surplus. This benefit is not offered by
insurance companies or even other pooling organizations.
Many municipalities look only at the initial premium cost when
considering coverage. They fail to consider the overall organization and
benefits of the insurance program. Looking solely at insurance from a
commodity perspective may cause one to overlook other significant and
important attributes that may result in savings in the long run.
MVRMA members are "owners" and share in the success and financial
benefits of the Association. We hope you will agree that as a result of
your membership in MVRMA, you have been able to improve loss control and
reduce the cost of risk for your community. This is a benefit not offered
by many other municipal insurance programs.
back to top
- Dinsmore & Shohl
Ohio Supreme Court Rules - Employees
Receiving Temporary Total Benefits Cannot be Terminated
In a decision that has serious ramifications for
Ohio employers, the Ohio Supreme Court unanimously ruled that employees
receiving temporary total disability payments under the state’s workers’
compensation laws cannot be terminated under facially neutral attendance
policies. Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School District, 100 Ohio St.
3d 141, 2003-Ohio-5357 (Oct. 22, 2003). In Coolidge, the Plaintiff,
a school teacher, was assaulted and seriously injured by a student. She
then began receiving temporary total disability ("TTD") compensation under
Ohio’s workers’ compensation system. After exhausting her paid leave, she
was placed on an unpaid leave pursuant to her employer’s leave of absence
policy, which provided employees up to one year’s time of unpaid leave.
Once the Plaintiff exhausted this one year of leave and remained unable to
return to work, the school board voted to terminate her on September 18,
2000, which was twenty-three months after the date of her injury.
The Plaintiff then sued, claiming that terminating
her while she was receiving temporary total disability compensation was a
wrongful discharge in violation of the public policy of the state of Ohio.
Surprisingly, the Court unanimously found for the Plaintiff. It held:
An employee who is receiving temporary total
disability compensation pursuant to [the workers’ compensation statutes]
may not be discharged solely on the basis of absenteeism or inability to
work, when the absence or inability to work is directly related to an
allowed condition.
The Court went on to state that an employee who is
receiving TTD compensation may not be discharged for failing to complete
required forms to request a leave of absence, or for failing to notify his
or her employer as to the length of the absence, where the employer is
otherwise on notice of the employee’s condition or status. The Court noted
that while it did not excuse or condone an absent employee who refuses to
provide his employer with information about his condition, it would not
permit an employer to circumvent the Court’s holding by phrasing an
absenteeism based discharge in terms of non-cooperation by the employee.
The Court’s opinion calls into question Ohio
employers’ leave of absence policies, in particular those that provide for
a maximum amount of leave, at which point the employee is considered a
"voluntary quit" or is automatically terminated. In addition, the opinion
calls into question employer attendance policies that use a point system
or other method that counts days missed due to a compensable injury
against an employee. Finally, the Court left many questions unanswered.
For example:
· What rights do employees have after being off
indefinitely, sometimes more than a year, on TTD leave when and if they
are able to return to work?
· Must the employer hold the employee's previous
position open indefinitely?
· Can an employer terminate an employee as soon as
the employee is off TTD leave or reaches maximum medical improvement? A
narrow reading of the opinion arguably supports this interpretation. In
contrast, this opinion also could be interpreted in a broad fashion,
similar to the federal Family & Medical Leave Act, where absences cannot
be counted against the employee and the employee is entitled to his or her
former job (or a substantially equivalent one) upon return from leave.
· Finally, how does this opinion impact collective
bargaining agreements in unionized settings that contain specific leave of
absence and seniority provisions?
At this point, the only thing clear is that
employees currently absent from work receiving TTD compensation cannot be
terminated solely due to their compensable absence or inability to work.
Employers should review their policies and consider making changes so the
policies do not run afoul of the Coolidge decision.
back to top
- Craig Blair
Most member municipalities have numerous requests
for the use of their facilities. These requests range from softball or
basketball leagues to festivals and concerts. During the holiday season, a
city may even receive a request for a Christmas tree lot. Allowing such
groups to use city facilities is good exposure for the city and a
benefit for its residents. However, as you know, exposure has two
very different meanings, and it is the "risk exposure" associated with the
event that concerns MVRMA.
There are generally three types of event sponsors:
the city, and non-profit or profit-making organizations. With
city-sponsored events, employees and/or volunteers are involved in all
aspects, from planning and set-up to managing and clean-up. Usually, no
fee is charged, and most precautions for safety have been considered. If,
however, the city charges a fee for the event, it will be held to a
different standard of negligence if a loss occurs. In either example,
MVRMA coverage would apply.
For events sponsored by profit or non-profit
organizations, member cities should have a policy in place with criteria
designed to reduce their risk exposure. This policy should require a
detailed explanation of the event to determine if the city facilities are
adequate. Questions concerning electrical capabilities and traffic control
should be addressed. Other considerations include adequate space between
booths for the safe flow of participants and walkways free from
obstructions. The city should require a contract between the parties,
which includes a "Hold Harmless" agreement. A certificate of insurance
naming the city, its employees, agents and volunteers additional insured
should also be provided. Being named additional insured means the city is
provided the same coverage as the event holder, if a loss occurs. If a
claim or lawsuit is filed related to the event, the event holder's
insurance would protect the city and handle the claim or defense of the
lawsuit.
It may seem inappropriate to ask the local Rotary
Club or other charitable group for a certificate of insurance, but a loss
can occur at even the most mundane event. A few years ago, a child was
struck by a vehicle in a city lot being used by a local organization to
sell Christmas trees. There was no certificate of insurance required, and
even though the city had nothing to do with the event, MVRMA had to defend
the lawsuit.
Remember, MVRMA is here to pay or handle any
insurable claims, but it's the members' duty to protect the association
from liability whenever possible.
back to top
-Starr Markworth
MVRMA Provides Contact
Hours
According to the Ohio Administrative code 3745-7-15,
after January 1, 2003, all certified wastewater treatment plant,
wastewater collections, water treatment plant and water distribution
system operators must provide proof of Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency Director approved contact hours prior to having their certification
renewed. This renewal process must be completed in a two-year period
preceding the certification expiration date.
What exactly does this mean to our cities? In order
for water, wastewater or water distribution operators to maintain their
licensure, they must complete continuing education credits. For example, a
person holding a certification as a public water system operator I must
complete not less than 12 hours of director-approved contact hours.
Depending on the level of certification, the number of contact hours could
either increase or decrease. For specifics on contact hour requirements,
see OAC 3745-7-15 or the Ohio EPA website at www.epa.state.oh.us.
Several times this year I was approached by
operators from our member cities and asked if MVRMA could provide courses
that are approved for contact hours. So far, MVRMA has been able to get
three courses approved through the EPA. These courses are:
l Work Zone Safety and Traffic Control
offered by LTAP for 1.5 contact hours
l Trenching and Excavation offered by
Mike Hayslip for 6 contact hours
l NAPD Heavy Vehicle Driver Training
sponsored by MVRMA for 12 contact hours
Also, MVRMA is working cooperatively with the Miami
Valley Communications Council's Municipal Training Academy to explore
other opportunities for obtaining these necessary contact hours.
All three of the MVRMA approved contact hour courses
will be offered several times in 2004. Please watch for our announcements
or contact me for further information at 937/438-8878 or by email at
smarkworth@mvrma.com.
back to top

Surety 101 - The Basics
Surety is an agreement that provides for monetary
compensation in the event of the failure to perform specified acts within
a stated period. For example, the surety company becomes responsible for
the fulfillment of a contract if the contractor defaults. Unlike
insurance, surety bonds are contracts that include three parties – the
party needing the bond (principal), the person protected (obligee) and the
insurer (surety). Under the Miller Act of 1935, federal contracts require
performance bonds on contracts over $100,000 and payment bonds on
contracts over $250,000. State and local governments have "Little Miller
Acts" that also require performance and payment bonds on public works
projects. Banks will also require surety bonds to protect the construction
lending on a project.
There are two types of surety: contract surety and
non-contract or commercial surety. Contract bonds are used in the
construction industry and include performance and payment bonds which
guaranty a company awarded a project/contract will actually complete the
service agreed to in the contract. These services can include capital
construction projects, outside service contracts or completion/improvement
projects. Non-contract or commercial surety bonds by definition are
required by courts and government entities to ensure compliance with
applicable laws.
General types of bonds:
Bid Bonds guarantee
that a bidder (the contractor) will actually complete his work at the
agreed upon bid price.
Performance Bonds
protect an owner from loss in the event a contractor fails to complete a
project within the contract terms and guarantee payments to cover the cost
of completion.
Payment Bonds
guarantee that a contractor will pay bills within the contract terms and
provide coverage for laborers, suppliers and other contract-related costs
owed third parties.
License and permit bonds
are required by statutes or ordinances for a number of
purposes including guaranteeing the payment of certain taxes and fees.
They provide consumer protection as a condition to granting licenses
related to selling real estate or motor vehicles and contracting services.
Surety bonds, through the surety companies’ rigorous
pre-qualification of contractors, protect the owner and offer assurance to
the lender, architect, and everyone else involved with the project. Before
issuing a bond, the surety needs to be fully satisfied that, among other
criteria, the contractor is of good character, has experience matching
requirements of the contract, has or can obtain the equipment necessary to
do the work, has the financial strength to support the desired work
program, has an excellent credit history and has established a banking
relationship and line of credit.
With a surety bond, the owner can be satisfied that
a risk transfer mechanism is in place. The risk of construction is shifted
away from the owner to the surety. If the contractor defaults, the surety
may pay for a replacement contractor, finance the existing contractor or
provide technical and/or financial assistance.
To bond a project, the owner includes the bonding
requirement in the plans and specifications for the project. Obtaining
bonds and delivering them to the owner is the responsibility of the
contractor.
Contact Marsh if you have any questions with respect
to surety bonds.
I
back to top
December 15
MVRMA Board Meeting
9:00 AM
MVRMA Offices
back to top
Many of the falls recorded at workplaces each year
are due to weather related conditions. As winter's ice and snow begin to
coat the outdoors, heed these tips to keep yourself safe and slip-free to
and from work:
1. Plan ahead. Check weather and traffic conditions
before you head to work so you can get ready accordingly.
2. Go slowly. Perform this simple test before you
step out of your car: stick a foot out to check for a slippery surface in
the parking lot. Don't rush into work; use handrails on your way into the
building if they're available.
3. Wear proper shoes. Shoes with flat or low heels
are the safest. In slippery weather, it's even better to wear a
rubber-soled, wide-tread shoe because the wider the tread the more
traction.
4. Think "cleats." If you walk during your lunch
breaks or work outside, think about buying shoes with cleats, or cleats to
slip onto your shoes or boots.
5. Beware of wet floors. When you step into a
building, scrape off any ice or snow on your shoes and begin to walk
carefully because hard floors will likely be slippery and wet from other
traffic.
Adapted from the U.S. Army Safety Website
back to top
|